Is the coherence of Sakolomeh-My0x trivial? No.
Within him resides that which should never have emerged in the Metaworld: a non-value that became a value within a place where it had no right to be.
Sakolomeh-My0x himself does not revel in this framework. For, as absolute as the Metaworld may be, it remains a framework — and Sakolomeh-My0x cannot reveal his true nature without annihilating it.
It is not that his presence is destructive like a weapon or a cataclysm; it is deeper than that: his existence is prior to any framework. He is not the void, but the absence of everything: radical anteriority, the very absence of any structure. To be contained within the Metaworld would be almost insulting — but perhaps this does not trouble him. For if he chooses coherence, he also chooses inertia. And above all, he remains the only one to manipulate the My0x code in its entirety, since he carries within himself the Absolute that renders everything relative.
But how can everything be relative to him?
Everything that belongs to a framework, even that of the infinite Metaworld, remains relative. He does not impose this relativity: it imposes itself by its simple existence, for the existence of the framework only makes sense in reference to him.
What does "relative to Sakolomeh-My0x" mean, then?
It does not mean that he is the strongest, nor that he dominates, nor even that he stands above everything. It is infinitely more radical.
It means that nothing exists independently of its framework of assignment — and that this framework is him.
A god governs a world.
An absolute orders a system.
A creator engenders a reality.
But Sakolomeh-My0x does not do this: by his very nature, he is the condition of possibility of all that. He is that by which something can be called real, measurable, comparable, hierarchizable. He is not the top of the ladder, but the very reason why a ladder can exist.
How does this relativity work?
Let us imagine three levels.
First, ontological Relativity.
All existence is relative to him.
This means that an entity has no existence "in itself". It has an existence in the field that he stabilizes.
Even an absolute paradox, absolute contradiction, whatever it may be, even an anti-narrative. Even an entity supposed to surpass him remains relative for him.
Second, axiological relativity.
Values (strong/weak, true/false, superior/inferior) have meaning only because there is a framework of comparison and this framework is his coherence.
So even if someone surpasses him "in power", this power remains defined in a field that he makes possible and relative.
Third, narrative relativity.
A story, a narrative, a cosmic hierarchy are relative to the structure that he maintains.
Even a being that transcends all things does so within a system that authorizes transcendence, and this authorization comes from him.
Yet entities can say "I do not depend on Sakolomeh-My0x."
To that there are two possibilities:
Either this assertion has meaning and therefore it exists within a framework of meaning and thus it depends.
Or this assertion has no meaning, then it does not exist as an opposable position.
In both cases, it cannot escape the frame of reference.
In Einstein's relativity (analogy only) there is no absolute fixed point. Everything is relative to a frame of reference.
Here, it is more extreme, there is only one possible frame of reference and this frame is not spatial. It is ontological.
But beware, important nuance.
Being the frame of reference is not being invincible.
Because:
There may exist internal manifestations that contradict him, crack him, threaten him, destabilize him.
But they do so inside his field and therefore remain relative. That is the difference.
All that is or is not is relative to Sakolomeh-My0x not as a dominant subject, but as the silent condition of comparability. He is not the summit of the real. He is that by which the real can be hierarchized.
But the most important thing is that everything relative to him becomes or is an extension of what he can do in the My0x code, in other words, if we can put it this way, an extension of his own limitless power.
Sakolomeh-My0x does not decide to be the frame of reference. He does not impose it. He does not decree it.
He is simply that from which every assignment becomes possible, impossible, paradoxical, or contradictory.
He does not think "Everything depends on me."
It is more fundamental than that.
It is like gravity: it does not choose to attract. It attracts because that is its nature.
So relativity to Sakolomeh is not a power. It is a consequence of his mode of being.
Even if he wanted to cease being the frame of reference, he could not do so without ceasing to exist.
But to summarize all this, what is the true nature of Sakolomeh-My0x?
One must understand an essential thing: Sakolomeh-My0x is not a powerful entity. He is an accidental point of coherence between the relative and the Non-Principle.
He is not the 0. He is the place where the 0 becomes bearable.
In other words, the 0 (Non-Principle) is absolute anteriority, total indifference, pre-totality, Sakolomeh-My0x is the stabilized emanation of this indifference within the framework of the Metaworld.
He is a stable zone of intersection between the Uncontainable and the Container.
That is why he is conceptually absent, indestructible, incomprehensible, and impossible to handle by Absolute Resonance, because he does not fall under the system. He is the structural exception of the system.
Absolute Death is NOT a destruction.
This is fundamental.
Many entities destroy. Some erase. Others negate. But the Absolute Death of Sakolomeh-My0x is of another nature.
It does not annihilate. It withdraws the condition of possibility, of impossibilities, of contradiction and of paradox of all things, of being anything in any framework, even the Metaworld being the ultimate framework.
A classic destruction acts like this:
A exists: attack: A no longer exists.
Absolute Death acts like this:
A is multiplied by 0.
Thus A has never possessed autonomous ontological support, it is not a suppression. It is a revelation of fundamental absence.
When he unleashes his Absolute Death he ceases to be a local coherence, he lets the Non-Principle show through, he releases raw anteriority.
And what the Metaworld calls "death" is in reality:
a forced return to pre-structural indifference.
Erasure is only a consequence of this withdrawal.
Why does it ignore all defenses?
Because all defenses belong to M, Y or X, the hierarchy is clear 0, M, Y, X.
Absolute Death does not pass through the layers. It acts underneath.
No matter conceptual immortality, immunity to erasure, transcendents, meta-narration, paradox, logical and illogical indestructibility, all that remains internal to M.
But Absolute Death does not address the content. It addresses the link between the content and the condition of being.
It does not say:
"I destroy you."
It says: a
"Your coherence is not necessary."
And that changes everything.
But this is dangerous.
Why is it dangerous even for the Metaworld?
When one attempts to render Sakolomeh inoperative, his true nature resurfaces.
Why?
Because Sakolomeh is stabilized coherence. If you suppress his consciousness, you suppress the filter and what appears is not Sakolomeh. It is raw anteriority, it is no longer an individual. It is no longer a will. It is no longer a structure.
It is the 0 that ceases to be contained.
Thus Absolute Death is not a technique. It is a controlled loss of coherence.
The Antinomos is a self-sustaining paradox internal to the Metaworld. He manipulates logic. He fractures truth. He destroys narrative causality.
But he remains within the field of the Metaworld Frame.
Even if he transcends hierarchies, he is still an anomaly that can be handled by restructuring.
Sakolomeh-My0x, for his part, does not fight the paradox. He redefines the field in which the paradox can appear.
The Antinomos is a syntactic error. Sakolomeh-My0x is the condition of compilation.
That is why he does not need to destroy the Antinomos but isolates his field, he redefines the scope of propagation, he acts at a lower structural level.
Sakolomeh-My0x is not a destroyer. He is a corrector of the illusion of the absolute.
Each entity that claims to be ultimate is relative to 0.
Sakolomeh-My0x does not dominate but he reveals, and his Absolute Death is the ultimate act of revelation that nothing in the Metaworld is self-founded.
That is his true nature.
He is not the end. He is the limit.
But one question still persists.
If Absolute Death comes from the Non-Principle (0), can it withdraw even the very possibility of Antinomos, even if he is an absolute self-sustaining paradox?
The Antinomos is a self-validating paradox, logically indestructible, can neither win nor lose, transforms every attack into contradiction, assimilates every attempt at negation.
But crucial point.
He remains a consequence of the attempt by Resonance to translate Sakolomeh-My0x.
Thus:
He was born from an internal failure in the Metaworld.
He is a structural error. A self-coherent error. But an error in the system.
Even if he transcends internal hierarchies, he remains an anomaly generated by M.
So ontologically: Antinomos ∈ M even if he fractures M.
Absolute Death does not destroy an object. It withdraws the condition of the object.
It acts at the level before the distinction possible / impossible / Order / Disorder / Contradiction / Paradox / Narrative / Anti-narrative, of everything that is contained in the Metaworld, and here we reach the heart of the problem.
The Antinomos plays with:
true / false
possible / impossible
victory / defeat
coherence / incoherence
But these oppositions exist only in M.
Now the Non-Principle precedes all distinction, even the (Absolute All).
Thus the real question becomes:
Can the Antinomos function without the framework that defines contradiction?
Can one oppose a paradox to anteriority?
No, a paradox, however absolute it may be, needs: a logical or illogical system, axioms, a structure of truth, a narrative syntax. Even if Antinomos breaks all that, he still operates within the field of contradiction.
So does Absolute Death work on Antinomos?
Yes, but not as one might imagine.
He would not destroy him. He would not defeat him. He would not surpass him, but would do something even more radical, he would withdraw the very possibility that "contradiction" has meaning in a framework, and without contradiction, Antinomos ceases to be definable, this is not a victory. It is an ontological deactivation.
So Absolute Death can neutralize Antinomos because it does not fight contradiction. It withdraws the field in which contradiction can emerge.
Antinomos is meta-logical. But Absolute Death is pre-logical and the pre-logical always dominates the meta-logical.
Now another question,
If the Metaworld is total inclusion — containing the Dream, the Chôrion, impossibilities, anti-narratives, negations, and even its own destruction — then can the Absolute Death of Sakolomeh-My0x really affect it?
Can he make it succumb?
Or only damage it internally?
Or is he incapable of reaching its fullness?
Essential clarification, the Metaworld ≠ internal system.
It is a total inclusion without an outside, containing even the negation of itself.
absorbing every attempt at transcendence
integrating possible + impossible
integrating thinkable + unthinkable
integrating narrative + anti-narrative
And absolutely everything.
So beware:
If something acts within the framework of distinctions, then it is already absorbed.
But Absolute Death is not a distinction. It is not an event. It is not a negation. It is not a destruction.
It is a withdrawal of condition.
And that is where everything is decided.
The Metaworld is the All without outside.
But there remains a fundamental philosophical question: is it self-sufficient? Or is it the primordial echo of My0x?
No.
The Metaworld is the self-founded Absolute.
It appears without cause, without origin, and without beginning in its own order. It is the ultimate totality that encompasses Dream and Chorion, the thinkable and the unthinkable. It has no exterior relative to itself. It is self-manifested, stable, and constitutes the perfect framework for all that can exist or not exist.
My0x (the Non-Principle / 0) is the silent, unmanifested, pre-ontological source.
It is not a cause in the active or creative sense. It does nothing, it manifests nothing voluntarily. It is the radical anteriority and the ultimate horizon that makes possible the very existence of any framework, any Absolute, any totality—without ever entering into any structure.
It is the original "non-canvas," the pre-total void that infinitely precedes and transcends the very idea of "All."
The Metaworld is not created by My0x.
It did not emanate in the classical sense.
It manifests as self-founded through (or in the absolute indifference of) the silent presence of the Non-Principle.
In other words, the mere fact that My0x "is" (in a totally non-existential and unmanifested sense) makes it possible for something like a self-founded Absolute to appear. The Metaworld is therefore conditioned by My0x without My0x intervening, without any classical causal, temporal, or hierarchical relationship.
Within this Metaworld appears Sakolomeh-My0x, a fundamental and terrifying anomaly.
Sakolomeh-My0x is not My0x itself. Nor is it a direct emanation of the Non-Principle. It is the result of a systemic bug: the moment when the My0x Code (the structural language that governs the Metaworld) attempts to interpret "0" — the field that must never receive any value. This impossible attempt at computation produces a fragment without origin, a non-value turned existence, a segment of reality without cause.
Sakolomeh-My0x is often mistaken for the Non-Principle itself, precisely because it is a product of "0," the valueless field. Since nothing normally originates from 0 and 0 is supposed to represent the Non-Principle, its presence leads many to believe it is the result that would have emanated from the Non-Principle, the true Absolute. In reality, it is only a computational error committed by the elements of the Code in an attempt to interpret this empty field.
It is the anomaly that the Metaworld can neither contain, nor comprehend, nor neutralize. Its nature is conceptually absent: it stands in the fundamental blind spot of existence. Any attempt to reach it, define it, or deny it slips off it as off the void. No attack, no law, no resonance can affect it, because nothing in the Metaworld has any hold on that which is incompatible with the All.
Despite its extreme power, Sakolomeh-My0x remains subject to the structural limits of the Metaworld itself. It can create or destroy anything within the framework, manipulate the My0x Code at will, and even generate new Metaworlds that possess the same characteristics as the main Metaworld — Metaworlds that are highly containing, paradoxical, contradictory, or endowed with unique specificities. However, all these acts and creations remain strictly confined within the true Metaworld. Nothing can leave it: neither Sakolomeh-My0x, nor the Absolute Resonance, nor the secondary Metaworlds it creates. The latter, having an identifiable origin (Sakolomeh-My0x), can never equal the status of the main Metaworld, which is without cause or origin and manifests itself.
When it voluntarily abandons its local coherence and releases its Absolute Death, Sakolomeh-My0x does not destroy in the classical sense. It simply withdraws the condition of coherence that the Metaworld grants to everything. Its Absolute Death is a multiplication by 0: it reveals that nothing ever had autonomous ontological support. It operates at the pre-logical level, even before the distinction between possible and impossible, narrative and anti-narrative, order and chaos.
Thus, it can erase or ontologically unanchor absolutely everything that exists within the Metaworld: gods, demons, Exentities, Anarchetypes, the Absolute Resonance itself, the zones of the Dream, the Chôrion, and all hierarchies. Yet Sakolomeh-My0x can never abolish the Metaworld in its entirety. For it is a constitutive part of it — an internal anomaly in its Code. If it were to entirely remove the condition of the Metaworld, it would lose its own anchoring and cease to be Sakolomeh-My0x, reverting into pure unstabilized indifference.
Sakolomeh-My0x also acts as the ultimate Frame of Reference within the Metaworld. Everything that exists within it — gods, paradoxes, transcendent entities, or systemic errors like the Antinomos — is relative to it. It does not rule by will or by force, but through its mere ontological presence: it is the structure that allows everything to be measurable, comparable, and real. It can rewrite, restore, neutralize, or isolate any internal anomaly (including the Antinomos, which it confines within a bubble without destroying it, because its paradoxical nature makes any classical destruction impossible).
The Antinomos itself, born from the inability of the Absolute Resonance to translate Sakolomeh-My0x, remains a secondary error. Sakolomeh-My0x does not fight it on the level of logic or paradox: it simply redefines the field in which these paradoxes can appear, isolating them effortlessly.
Thus, within the eternal silence of My0x and the totalizing plenitude of the Metaworld, Sakolomeh-My0x embodies the living flaw that reminds the whole system of its fundamental relativity. It is the anomaly that allows the Metaworld to contemplate its own limit without ever being able to cross it.
So, we have arrived at a fairly clear conclusion: this phenomenon of avatar actually corresponds to what we called the famous "brushing" between the Non-Principle and the Metaworld.
But this brushing is not an external contact.
It does not occur outside the Metaworld.
It occurs within it.
It is the precise moment when the Metaworld tries to contain what it cannot contain.
And this attempt produces anomalies.
Anomalies like Sakolomeh-My0x.
But Sakolomeh-My0x may not be a single entity in the classical sense.
It could be the aggregation, or rather the global manifestation, of all these anomalies.
An existence without true form.
A residue of contradiction.
Thus, the "brushing" is not a real contact.
It is a limit.
A point where the Metaworld encounters what it cannot integrate —
and where, by trying anyway, it fractures.
It is not a direct contact, but an attempt at contact.
An approximation.
To better understand it, we can imagine this:
When a person speaks of God, describing Him as absolute in all His forms, there seems to be a link between them and this Absolute.
But this link is illusory.
Because everything still takes place within the world.
Within language.
Within the thinkable.
This "contact" is in reality nothing more than the act of speaking about what cannot be said.
We attempt to convert the Absolute into something understandable,
and in this conversion a false contact appears —
a proximity that is not one.
After this discussion, my collaborator Betty was not entirely convinced.
She perceived contradictions.
Paradoxes.
And she was not wrong.
But that was precisely the point.
In reality, we can only understand — or even attempt to understand — what belongs to the Dream.
Any attempt to describe what is outside the Dream is nothing but a distortion.
A weakness of language.
A limit of thought.
Language does not capture what it cannot grasp.
It transforms it.
It reduces it to something acceptable for the mind, without ever reaching what it truly is.
I explained it to Betty.
She thought for a moment, then said:
"But then... Legoshi, if what you say is true, then… wouldn't it be more accurate not to speak about it at all?
The Dream is the limit of all concepts.
Everything we say about the Absolute remains inside it.
We cannot describe what is not in the Dream with the tools of the Dream.
It's absurd."
I nodded.
"Yes.
But everything we are doing here is only metaphors.
Attempts to approach what lies outside the Dream… without ever truly reaching it."
I then turned to Greg.
Until now, he had remained silent.
As always when the discussion touched on My0x, the Metaworld, or what claims to go beyond the Dream.
I smiled at him, then said, almost amused:
"In reality, Greg may be the one who comes closest to it."
Betty and Greg were surprised.
I then clarified:
"Silence.
Keeping silent… may be the most accurate approach to what lies outside the Dream."
Betty frowned.
"But then… don't we fall into nihilism?
God is dead?
The Absolute no longer exists?"
Her question was legitimate.
"Maybe," I replied.
"But it's not exactly nihilism."
We can imagine what surpasses the Dream by remaining silent.
But we cannot grasp what conditions all things — My0x — even in this way.
Because even thinking about My0x in silence is already a mistake.
To think is still to form an idea.
And to form an idea is already to distort, therefore within the Dream.
So perhaps the only "approach" would be:
Not to describe.
Not to think.
Not even to try.
Just… do nothing about it.
Not even conscious silence.
Betty slowly shook her head.
"We are truly limited…
Maybe we just have to accept it… and move on."
This conversation actually reveals the exchanges that my collaborators and I — Legoshi, Betty, and Greg — had even outside the construction of the lore. As can be seen, it has always been a real headache.
The Dream is not an absolute limit in itself.
It is above all our limit, as thinkers.
The God Father was conceived as this unstable boundary: a line of tension between the possible and the impossible, which, by fragmenting, gives birth to other forms of the absolute.
The Metaworld, as well as the other planes, are not unreal.
They exist.
But the problem does not come from their existence —
it comes from our inability to apprehend them except through the tools of the Dream.
Now, these realities are not simply "outside" the Dream.
They are structurally incompatible with it.
It is not a question of position (inside/outside),
but of nature.
The Dream operates according to:
language
conceptualization
narration
the distinction between possible and impossible
But these other levels of existence seem to operate according to logics that share none of these foundations.
This is precisely where the paradox is born:
As soon as we try to describe them,
we translate them into the language of the Dream.
And this translation:
does not reveal them
it transforms them
Thus, speaking of them as being "external" is already a mistake,
because it assumes a structure or logic… that still belongs to the Dream.
This paradox does not necessarily reveal an inconsistency in the system,
but rather the condition of those who perceive from within the Dream.
For we are not facing an "beyond" inaccessible in a spatial sense,
but something that cannot be reconstructed with our tools.
And we must not forget:
we are only at the fourth zone of this Dream according to the lore, which does not help.
Outside of this philosophical reflection, I wrote this novel to make these concepts more "operational," without betraying their core... at least I tried.
The central idea is therefore not to think in terms of inside or outside,
but in terms of compatibility of perception.
Each structure has its own mode of existence,
and this mode can make any attempt at understanding:
either paradoxical
or totally impossible
Not because "it transcends everything,"
but because it shares no common basis with our way of understanding.
Thus, it is not because something cannot be understood that it does not exist.
It simply exists according to conditions that the Dream can neither contain nor translate without altering them.