Atlas won five defenses in a row in the previous category. And clearly, those were major victories. After all, their opponents were alliances with a greater number of lords. On top of that, their average levels were also higher.
Even so… in that previous category, all five lords who attacked Atlas were only rank 2. Not a single one of them had reached rank 3.
So, from this fact alone, what can actually be concluded?
Perhaps it shows that strategy in lord battles is truly complex. There are many types of attacks and defenses, and each lord has their own unique ability system. All of this creates its own layers of difficulty and depth.
However, one small conclusion can still be drawn. Maybe… focusing purely on defense does come with a lower level of difficulty compared to those who try to balance both defense and offense at the same time.
