Yao Yuan explained: "The 'evidence' is relatively easy to understand; as long as it's evidence that 'clearly points to someone possibly being the imitator,' it can be used as an opening condition.
"For example, in a more extreme case: if a game prototype draft designed by Gao Teng is accidentally discovered by a player in the community, he can use this draft as evidence to accuse Gao Teng.
"Of course, this situation is an extreme exception; finding concrete evidence is very difficult.
"Therefore, in the absence of evidence, you can also use 'a complete logical chain that can prove the other person is the imitator' to open the judgment.
"I believe that opening a judgment doesn't require a special process or voting.
"Because the proposal has already set a 'false accusation penalty' segment, if the 'accuser' cannot provide a sufficient logical chain or evidence, they will also face significant risk themselves, so they wouldn't dare open a judgment without adequate preparation.
