Everyone fell into deep thought. Looking at the game mechanics, this analysis indeed has a high possibility of being valid.
The true selection criteria of the Imitator is not 'morality,' but 'ability.'
That is, intelligence, decisiveness, and execution power.
However, during the selection process, since it is framed with a 'voluntary confession' filter, it misleads the audience.
They subconsciously believe that such players are inclined to be benevolent.
And players who voluntarily confess certainly won't give up such a 'moral asset,' and will actively perform to meet the audience's expectations.
Thus, as the game proceeds with normal mechanics, the audience and the 'Director of Pharmaceutical Manufacturing' naturally come to a mutual journey, as if there are truly selfless and just players in the elimination game.
But upon more careful consideration, you'll realize the problem:
