This incomplete theory, not even scientifically, claims that man, before he had common ancestors with the great apes, was a fish swimming in the sea and in the depths of the oceans and passed through many animals from which he evolved until he became a human, as the theory of evolution says, which claims that the animals from which man evolved were initially a cell. Let no one know where this cell came from. Then the cell turned into a fish swimming in the depths of the seas and oceans, then into a lizard, then into a mammalian creature, then into a type of monkey called the great ape or which are cousins with the monkeys, then into a human. It is funny that you, as an enlightened atheist, think of yourself as a cell that came from nothing or from an unknown that no one knows about, then turned into a fish swimming in the ocean, then into a body of water, then into a lizard, then turned into a mammalian creature, then into a cousin of the monkey, and finally became a human or a complete human being. And here I say cousin of the monkey because you, O group of infidels, think or say that there is an ancestor left between you and the monkeys, and that over the years and centuries you have evolved with time. And if someone asks you when all this happened, you will say with all simplicity and confidence, I do not know where it came from, and on what basis you will say that all this evolution occurred hundreds of years and millions of years ago. Now let us see your evidence, or rather the evidence of the evolution that you have disbelieved in. By your Creator, for her sake, let us see this theory and its alleged evidence, what it relies on and how it is a theory that has proven its failure and incompleteness. First, the fossils or formations engraved millions of years ago in the cavities of the earth have proven the error of the theory of evolution, through obtaining animals with complete growth without obtaining any evolutionary forms for them or any common ancestor for them. This proves beyond doubt that the owner of the theory was in good doubt and was not confident of the completeness or perfection of his theory, as it seems to me in his confusion that he was wondering, saying: Why, if there are evolutionary forms for organisms, why do we not see everywhere huge numbers of transitional and evolutionary stages for all living organisms, and why do we see that the fossil record did not clarify or show that there was in one way or another any type of transitional stages for organisms, and why do we not find them buried in countless numbers in the earth's crust??!! The confusion of those who invented or claimed the validity of this incomplete and incorrect theory is still ongoing, and there are researches and studies by people who believe in In science, people like you, but they are at a higher level of credibility, as their research has proven that there is a scarcity and very few creatures in transitional stages, which shows that it constitutes a secret and mystery in paleontology, and that the fossil record does not support this alleged theory of evolution. On the contrary, it is considered a circular inference if we use the fossil record to support this theory, because fossils in the interior of the earth do not prove or clarify that there were transitional and evolutionary stages for living organisms. If we happen to see that, it is a very rare occurrence. If what you say or what this theory claims is true, the one who invented it, or rather the one who invented it, would not have been puzzled by the scarcity or absence of the fossil record, which confirms that there are no transitional stages for organisms, which demolishes this theory from its foundation and proves that it is incorrect. What makes matters worse is that there are those like you who support this theory who have resorted to forgery and lying to prove the validity of the theory of evolution. If they find remains of any part of a living organism, they immediately claim that it is the result of evolution. And that they have common ancestors with humans, while it turns out in the end that they are the remains of a part of an extinct animal that has no common ancestors with humans, and the claim of the similarity of genetic codes in living organisms and DNA is not a scientific claim at all, because the similarity, gentlemen , is evidence that the Creator is one and that this similarity is nothing but a natural necessity and a necessity for the food chain and food pyramid for all living organisms.. And of course, you, the group of atheist infidels who deny the idea of the great god Antar, in order to prove the validity of your theory of evolution, claimed that there is only a one percent difference between humans and chimpanzees, but it was later shown in scientific research such as yours and of the same type, and I read it myself, it was shown that there was tampering with this percentage and that the percentage of difference is five percent and is also subject to increase, and all this and that tampering and manipulation in this scientific research was done by people like you and others of your friends who support this theory of evolution, so your infidelity pushed you to revolt and tamper to prove the validity of your theory, but fate willed God Almighty reveals your lies and with the same scientific method and research that combines science and faith. Here I am responding to your claims with the same method and with science. I debate your ideas and prove your theory and the error of your belief, you infidels to your Creator and the world of absurdity. If I follow your ideas, then I will see myself as perhaps ninety percent of me is a mouse or 85 percent of me is a cow or perhaps half of me is a banana because the DNA in bananas cares about the DNA in humans. What is this twisted logic you have, you atheists? Here the people sitting who were following the heated debate laughed and laughter filled the place. Among them were those who believed and believed what Ibn Marra Al-Halou was saying, and among them, and in secret of course, were those who followed the ideas and position of Aref and his friends, but feared the harm that would befall them from the followers of Antar and his soldiers, who he says are his angels. Also among those present was (the grandfather (Nasr) who came to attend this historic debate despite his illness. He came leaning on the shoulder of his friend Abu Al-Hikma who was sitting next to him and they were exchanging glances and laughing in sarcastic whispers whenever Arif silenced his debater with words or deeds, but when Ibn Mara Al-Helou continued his talk and defended his faith and his Creator against Arif, Grandfather Nasr felt anxious and disturbed and turned towards Arif who exchanged glances with his grandfather and smiled at him confidently as if to reassure him that he was ready to respond to this patchwork believer and all the grandfather had to do was wait for the grandson to attack his opponent in this verbal battle. Meanwhile, Abu Al-Hikma was laughing sarcastically at everything he heard as if he was gloating over everything that was happening and taking place before his eyes. Here Ibn Mara Al-Helou cleared his throat and continued his talk while saying with all insolence and confidence: What is funny and illogical to all evolutionists and the thing that has baffled them and the biggest dilemma they face is how does any language in the world appear by chance and randomness??!! Any programming or roll needs a sender and a receiver or an encoder, so how about the most complex language in the world, which is genetic codes and DNA, which is the origin of life and the language of life? It is really something funny and very unfortunate, rather it is something extremely ridiculous and reckless, and even foolish. What is more complex than that is that there is a very complex mechanism to repair DNA errors, and atheist evolutionary scientists like you do not have any explanation for this complexity and this complex mechanism except to say that it came about by chance, randomness and mutations.. and I do not know what coincidence they are talking about??!! And I, in turn, say to you and them, respect our minds that you claim to think with and follow its approach because this complex mechanism is the basis and without which the living being would not have existed. So how, for God's sake, did all this complexity come about by chance?? How?? How can something on which life was built and by which the living being existed and derived its existence from it, come about by randomness, chance and mutations? Chance and randomness cannot create a complete first life, nor can they create a complex, complex system. Science, now at its strongest, cannot create or bring into existence the simplest forms of life. I see you evading the answer when asked about the explanation of the first emergence of life. Why do you evade? Because the emergence of life by chance and randomness is impossible and is never accepted by reason or logic. In one of your most famous scenarios, you atheist evolutionists, is the emergence of the first molecule of life and that it was formed by chance and randomness, which you call or what is called ( the world of RNA). The largest and most important reliable scientific research has proven that this theory of the world of RNA is impossible because it lacks many of the main elements and that the solution is to think of another theory. Science has proven that there must be a minimum number of genes for the emergence of any life and that any living organism cannot appear or live with less than hundreds of genes. I say this scientific statement to you and to atheists like you so that you do not have any argument or objection and that the existence of hundreds of genes is impossible to have come by chance and is something outside the realm of possibilities originally. Now I want to I have two questions for you and all enlightened atheists like you. First: Why is man the only being who possesses consciousness, reason, perception, and logic, and is he the only speaking animal? The second question is: Is it logically and rationally possible for chance, randomness, and blind mutations to create organs and functions of the utmost precision , complexity, perfection, and order? Of course, the one who created you must be the best of creators, the Almighty and Most High… In addition, experimental science depends on observation, watching, and experimentation, and this is what the theory of evolution lacks . No one has ever seen or observed that an animal evolved from one species to another, and this strongly confirms that what you are promoting about the validity of this theory is not true and that it is a completely wrong theory. Even scientists like you who reject religion and reject faith, even these have rejected this theory and found that it lacks a lot of scientific and logical evidence because it simply failed to answer many questions regarding the emergence of life and the first primitive cell, which no one knows where it came from. ,,,And here I say to the atheists who cling to science, I say to them that scientific truth is subject to change and science is always changing and there is no absolute truth in science and many scientists like you also admitted that in the future they will need to change this theory of evolution that you rely on or at least make modifications to it, so why all this insistence on the theory of evolution and deluding people that it is true?? The answer is simply that science so far stands helpless in the face of knowing the secret of the diversity of living organisms and there is no material alternative to knowing the secret of diversity and the scientific community does not want to appear helpless in the face of knowing the diversity of living organisms…and because the science that you follow and say with all confidence I believe in science…this science does not use the word creator and any scientist who says or even hints that this complexity and mastery in the study of intelligent design must have a creator and that chance and randomness cannot play the role of the creator, then this scientist will be immediately fired from his job, so there are many scientists who preferred to remain silent.
Here the battle raged and the audience was agitated and seething, and looks of anxiety and tension began to invade the heart of Grandfather Nasr. His coughing increased and became louder, but his intermittent beats subsided amidst the noise of the audience, so the moderator of the debate silenced them and took over the helm of speech and handed the banner of dialogue to Aref, since the time allotted to Ibn Mara Al-Halou had ended.
When Aref took over the dialogue and it was his turn to speak and respond, he smiled the smile of a confident, victorious man and added, saying: As we are always accustomed to, gentlemen, from all believing slaves, that in order to please their belief and religion and for the sake of their faith, you find them fully prepared not only to sell their minds and surrender them to the metaphysical god without return, but they are fully prepared to patch, fabricate and forge for the sake of faith, because they will not taste the sweetness of faith and the satisfaction of the Most Gracious unless they completely dispense with everything that is reasonable and logical. Rather, in order for faith to increase and be real, every believer must be stupid. Yes, in order to become a believer, you must be stupid. I apologize for uttering this description, as I do not mean to personify, but I am putting things in their proper place, describing the believer with true faith, that Brother Ibn Marra Al-Halou resorted to patching through the use of famous logical fallacies, which were his false evidence that he relied on to delude us that he speaks with scientific facts, logic and reason, and the first of these fallacies is bias. The confirmation is that he sided with his religion, his god and his beliefs as if they were a confirmed and proven fact in a scientifically logical way that is not very much, and all of this is just because he has a holy book that he claims is from a god and is not a human fabrication and author as we see it, and he tended to search and exhausted himself in searching for evidence that supports his theory and ideas and chose for himself from all the words and research he read what supports his ideas, and this is after patching them up, of course, and ignoring all the theories and evidence that refute and challenge the validity of his words and did not give them the same attention that he gave to the evidence that he sees from his point of view that supports his ideas and religious beliefs, and this is what is called support without refutation, and it is also correct for us to call what he did the fallacy of appealing to the unknown, as he assumed that his beliefs are correct in the absence of any evidence that indicates that he is wrong, and I will prove that he is completely wrong. You mentioned in your speech that the theory of evolution is incomplete and incorrect and that there are dependencies around it. First, I want to ask you if you are You consider it illogical and funny that a human being finds himself originally a fish swimming in the oceans or that he was a banana or a mammal and you see that this talk is illogical and there is no ideological evidence for it or proof to support it and that the reality is much the opposite of this. So do you think that it is logical, convincing and respectful of reason for you and your preachers and your god Antar to deceive the naive believing slaves that they were created from primitive humans made of sticky clay and that he was the first human and the first land creature and he is the original father of all humans and from his crooked rib came his female who is the mother of the land! Come on, the absurdity of this logic, where is the logic, you who are the harlots of truth in this ridiculous claim?? And if God is all-powerful as you claim, O group of believing slaves, why does he resort to primitive methods like a child who plays with clay to eat a piece of his toy and then leaves it in the sun to dry and breathes into it from his mighty spirit so that it becomes a human by His permission!!! What kind of mind and what kind of contempt is this?? And where is your respect for our minds? Rather, say where is the power of this god?? Isn't He able to say to Him, "Be," and it is, immediately, without resorting to this primitive method? Is He an incapable God, or is He still lacking a lot in how to create as an all-powerful, all-powerful God? Regardless of your contempt for the value and position of women and females, and regardless of the fact that your religion and all your beliefs have insulted women and have been extremely patriarchal, as your religious stupidity has portrayed to you that the male has a higher status than the female, and that he is the preferred one for the arrogant male god who despises women, so he created them according to the alleged narrative of the one who led astray , the crooked one from the first human being? In addition to the falsehood of this story and its lack of selection, there has not been and will not be any evidence, not even a single hair has appeared on the body or head of this righteous man or father of mankind and the first human being. There is nothing that indicates his existence, not even a strand of his head, nor is there a place for his grave in which he was buried hundreds or thousands of years ago.
Draft I do not delete this speech at the beginning until I finish writing Aref's response inside the novel so that I do not forget the rest of the speech and I look at it while writing so that I remember (Aref responds through three logical fallacies committed by Ibn Marra Al-Halou, which are first confirmation bias, then cherry-picking from the words of scientists, as he patches, changes and selects what is permissible for him, then the straw man fallacy when he assumed that there are atheists who say that it is a coincidence that the universe brought about.. and Aref responds to him through his words in which he says respect our minds, so Aref says to him, and does your religion respect your mind through the myths that you believe in and trust in their credibility, and which is better, scientific research and speech or metaphysical speech, and no matter how many shortcomings there are in scientific research, he is more respectful of the mind than the myths of metaphysics and religion, and he responds to him through the fact that science and scientists, the owners of the theory of evolution, evade the answer, so Aref tells him that scientists do not evade because science only knows integrity and truth and does not like to pass judgments In vain, like religion, and let him acknowledge metaphysics, and this is credited to science, not against it, because what you call evasion is not investigation , accuracy, integrity, and conscience in scientific response and research, and it is not evasion as you claim, because science does not apply the patchwork that exists in the metaphysics of religions, and the brunt of health and the arm, like religion, is not present in science. It is silent, waiting for the truth, and it is not evasion. Then, Arif performs on him about intelligent design and says that he is not intelligent from a video on YouTube called The Best of Creators on the other channel, an old video, and Arif explains to him the theory of evolution through George Boole, and Arif explains to him that the complexity in the universe and creative chaos are greater than the issue of the sender, receiver, and encoder in the universal language or life or the first language of life that he talked about, and this is easy in superficial matters and superficial thinking and the simple, limited mother is what needs a sender, receiver, and encoding and evasion. As for accumulation, natural selection, and creative chaos, it is the greatest maker and it is more complex and deeper than the ideas of believers who imagine that it is a limited and simple process like the sender, encoder, and receiver, and comparing between both is not very simple. This does not mean that if there is a complication, then God or Allah did it and He is the Creator because of the complication. This is the problem of the believer who always needs a mythical being to throw all the complications on him and make him he must take his orders as a believer from the Creator. This is the method of subordination that the believer is accustomed to in order to keep his mind and relax. Not using the word Creator in science is evidence that it is a word that cannot be followed or conducted for scientific research and follow-up and experimentation. Rather, it is a fantasy within a fantasy. As long as you follow science and say that the theory of evolution lacks the principles of scientific research, how can we use the word Creator and investigate your great hidden God who is exalted above us? Will we then become believers? Faith requires distancing ourselves from logic and submitting to the supernatural in the senses. How can you be contradictory and demand the existence of principles of scientific research, investigation and experimentation, then believe in the necessity and confirmation of the existence of your God? How? What is this important contradiction? If he knows, he will respond to it with scientific talk about the theory of evolution from the explanation of George Paul and from the words of the video of the best of creators and the words of Bilal Al-Iraqi about the strange, illogical formation of the human body. Aref added, completing his talk, saying, is it logical? That a person thinks he is the son of a person you claim is the father of mankind and that he was created from clay from mud, as if we were God. He was sitting feeling bored, so he made a piece of clay in the shape of a human and left it next to him until it dried in the sunlight. What logic is there in this nonsense? The evidence for the existence of this person is that I bet you that if you bring me even a hair from the head of this father of mankind or prove to us the location of his grave and we are sure that he died inside it, I will immediately return to the faith I had. Then where is the logic in the story of a god who seems to be clumsy or naive after he causes a piece of clay and blows it into the shape of a human being, asking others to kneel and bow to this being? Doesn't he claim that he is a god and that prostration is for someone other than him? Why does he make this request, as if he wants to differ or invent something that is not convincing at all? And what angers the damned Saman, as you call him? And accordingly, if he refused to prostrate to a human, doesn't this satisfy his arrogant divine narcissism? Where is your respect for your mind and the minds of other believers when you ask them to believe these myths? It is a story that lacks even the simplest elements of a dramatic plot by a writer and author who has failed par excellence. And there is no creator or ruler who claims to be a god. Then there is something else that the believers did not think about, which is why if the cursed Saman knew in advance about his fate and that he would go to eternal hell, then what would he benefit from and what would come back to him if he trusted that there is a god and that he would torment him with eternal fire? And how does your god claim that he was created from the same material as fire? And why did the god Antar not mention anything in the Holy Book about how Satan will be tormented on the Day of Judgment? I did not find a single verse that talks about that. Is it conceivable that Saman is the source of the calamity and that he is the one who whispers his evils to every believer to distance him from the path of the Most Gracious out of his hatred for the believers? He is the basis of the calamity and the only enemy of the god Antar. Then he does not mention any torment specific to the youth and does not talk about that. He only talks about the torment of the believers who are disobedient to him. Is n't this something strange that calls for questioning and confirms beyond doubt that he is not a god from the beginning and that he is a tyrannical, unjust ruler who wants to impose his authority on his people and wants to exploit the principle of the stick and the carrot for every believer to turn him into an obedient donkey who hopes to get the carrot and is afraid of being hit by the stick in order to be a true believer? So he has to be an obedient, fearful donkey who fears God. So the issue has become clear. It is a trick to control and tighten the grip on the people to make the naive believer live between the hammer and the anvil, between two fists that alternate in hitting him with words of faith, intimidation and terror, and then encouragement and analysis in submission and humiliation. These are the most important qualities of faith and the strong believer. A common duality between the tyrannical ruler and his religious men from his three preachers, Maher, Shaher and Qaher. Where is the respect for reason and where is the logic in all this and that? I see nothing but an insult to reason and awareness in any normal human being. He cannot accept such a vile trick that violates his humanity and humiliates him greatly under the guise and slogan of faith. This false, hateful slogan. In order to be a believer, you have to be stupid, cowardly and humiliated, otherwise your faith is lacking and the satisfaction of the Most Gracious God is lacking. Oh, from a cheap, despicable principle that is noisy and promises humanity and the desire to control and tighten the grip and control the destinies of others and to direct them as they, the beasts, direct. During their deception with the lie of creation from clay, that lie that has no connection to science or logic at all, and that it is more beloved and honorable for me to be of a common origin in my life with a banana or a monkey, a whale or a fish, I know the origin of the ancestors and I have a logical explanation that is better and more beloved to me than this cursed, fake story that is full of lies and even the mind of a small child would believe it, so how do you, my sweet son of a bitter woman, want to convince us through your hateful promotions? But on the other side of the subject, if you look at the theory of evolution that you claim has a major deficiency, and regardless of your false claims and cherry-picking and montage and stories and the cuts that you made during your speech to deceive our minds and to prove with it the images of the accuracy of your false lies, and regardless of the fact that the deficiency and incompleteness of the theory does not negate the truth or change it in any way, it is logical and convincing thousands of times more than the story of creation from clay and from the father of mankind that you claim, and also the incompleteness or deficiency of its pillars does not mean in any way Of the circumstances or the god that you worship as a believer is the fact that the deficiency of the theory of evolution does not mean in any way that he exists and to prove this the existence of the god that you mean or even in others we have not found scientifically until now what proves or even denies the existence of any gods of any kind that created or created this universe and if you tell me that science is not like your hopes and that it did not prove but did not deny the existence of a god this will not make room for the god of the gaps that you or other believers worship to put your god in this empty gap and force him into it. And also the refugee and nothingness is a zero of emptiness that also cannot be proven and I deny it only because nothing is nothingness and smallness and emptiness I understand what you mean why did the hateful god Antar present himself in this void and this gap to prove his existence without convincing evidence whether he proves it or others and also why does he always hide himself from the day he announced the mysterious, strange, and strange glow why is he so keen on hiding and why does he hide from us why does he not have the prestige to confront it We were truly his slaves and he is our Creator. Does he have a secret that he is hiding or is he ashamed of us or is there something unnatural about this? This makes me go directly to the theory of evolution, which depends on you as much as possible on scientific and logical convincing evidence, without any deception . The theory of evolution, which you have criticized so harshly, first of all, many of you, when you confuse one of us , the first thing you say about the theory of evolution is that it is just a theory or a hypothesis, and let us rise to the level of the real thing that is taken and relied upon, and you cling to this foolish statement and build through this belief all the logical fallacies that you committed in your conversation with me, from the beginning, the confirmation bias fallacy, then cherry-picking, then the straw man fallacy that you made from your imagination and assumed that he said such and such to find a justification or an entrance for your promotions and find what to say to save face, or rather the face of your miserable faith whose position has been severely shaken, and I will refute all your fallacies, first the cherry-picking fallacy, which is your belief that it is just a hypothesis and not a fact because some researchers and scientists have found loopholes in it or some aspects that need completion or clarification, and of course science will gradually continue to do this because science is honest and truthful enough, as it follows the steps of research, investigation, and logical scientific inquiry and the real effort expended and it walks Defeat even if for hundreds of years of research, investigation, experiments and research, science does not use the method of attack, rush, services, entertainment, lies and reconciliation used by the holy religious books and the methods of preachers who obey the command of the ruling god or the ruling god Antar Al-Antari. I would like from this standpoint to prove to you and the evidence that it is not as you think, just a theory or an assumption because the gaps that scientists talked about did not mean to diminish the importance of the theory of evolution, but rather they intended to seek to complete the incomplete aspects or clarify what was lacking in its clarity with this very respected theory and not cherry picking that you chose to prove the validity of your religious superstitions that depend on metaphysics and the unseen. Also, these shortcomings in the theory of evolution do not mean in any way that it is not alive and are sufficient to demolish it, but rather they are just simple gaps that do not diminish the importance and status of the theory of evolution as one of the most important theories that science and research have proven to be true and not just an assumption. A fact that has been scientifically researched for many years, just like the theory of gravity, which has been proven to be true. The same thing happened with the theory of evolution, and they are like many scientific evidences that prove its validity. As a true theory, scientifically proven, just like the theory of gravity, whose validity is not denied by anyone, even believers. Just complete scientific facts such as temperature and others. This is a big confusion. The attempts of those like you always use the idea that it is an assumption and a hypothetical theory and not real. I do not want to reassure you that it is real. The problem is in your minds, you people of slaves. Believers and secondly the straw man fallacy is that you imagined or patched and fabricated for yourself the idea that many scientists in other scattered places in the west of our planet Antar and T and from its north or east rejected this theory and that it was dropped through their research and that they themselves rejected and said about it and were not convinced by it and this of course did not happen and is not true just that you are just bragging about this lie because the number of those who rejected the theory in the west or north or even the south of our planet is a cup from us and they did not exceed two percent of all the scientists who are certain of it and who are in all fields of biology and biological fields in all their branches and forms and it is still the prevailing and convincing theory of a number of scientists and it is studied and explained in many places and scientific centers in many parts and hopefully many of our planet Antar and the very small percentage of scientists who criticize it they did not provide scientific evidence for the reasons for their criticism but their criticism is not supported by any scientific evidence did not and will not affect the status of the theory of evolution nor its fame and scientific status among many scientists in addition to the fact that these minority who doubt this theory have secret agendas under the table and there are many From religious parties or other parties that have an interest in belittling this theory and supporting the idea that it is incomplete through some of the skeptics and critics of it, and the theory has never fallen and still maintains its position among biologists and doctors who are scientifically certain that it contains many scientific facts that support the validity of the theory of evolution to your claim that the theory of evolution asserts that humans or man originated from monkeys, and this is of course a lie and a logical fallacy from your many fallacies that you have committed because the theory of evolution has not and will not say that humans originated from monkeys at all because the theory of evolution simply says that humans and the individual both have a common ancestor between them that made their evolution from other ancient forms and creatures similar in some features and genes as a natural result of a common ancestor or common ancestors, but it was divided into two sections, a section specific to animals such as monkeys and chimpanzees and the other section specific to humans, but you insist on claiming by saying that this is the origin of that, meaning that man originated from monkeys, you are a deceiver, and if you were to tell me and argue with me why the form of the monkey did not evolve and man only evolved from different forms To its current form I will answer you simply because the monkey is one thing and humans are something different to enter this with that The common ancestor between them or cousins does not exist because it evolved and became either a human or an ape, two different parts, but they were the result of one common origin between both of them, but this common origin split into two parts so that each part of them entered the other in the way it developed and in its developed stages after that, and perhaps because there is a common origin that may explain why this is the existence of forms of some humans that remind you of some birds or animals, so if you look at any human and want to compare him to an animal, you will find among the animals or birds those who resemble him as a result of the existence of this common ancestor or grandfather who was originally before he split into two parts or two different sides or two branches from a third origin. One of your biggest logical fallacies is that you claim the idea of a straw man who you assume told you something wrong to justify your response to him, such as your assumption that you and many preachers, believers and religious people claim that the theory of evolution explained and interpreted the origin of the universe, and this did not happen at all. In fact, you criticize an explanation or assumption that you made up from your imagination and it did not happen at all, because the theory Evolution does not explain anything but everything that is biological or related to living things and organisms only, to change and did not address anything close or distant to the origin of the universe or its beginnings. The theory of evolution does not explain the universe and the origin of life. It only explained the evolution that happened to living things. Since the beginning of the existence of the cell, Arwa and bacteria, until the end of the evolution or existence of man in his current form, it is only null and void, but it did not talk about what existed in him before the cell, Arwa, from the beginning The matter is still under scientific research. Science, as I told you, is never in a hurry , because integrity and credibility require and oblige science not to be in a hurry and to investigate the facts. Evolution , my dear believer Ibn Marra Al-Halou or Al-Halou Ibn Marra, is simply an evolution or mutation that occurs in the genes. This mutation, which is the DNA, results in the acquisition of a new function for this living being or the loss of a function. All of this is through the DNA tape, which is the tape that is inherited from others and passed on to other generations that will come because of this mutation after it occurs and becomes part of the pillars of the living being and becomes the new function. The function that was lost also remains inherited in the organisms of other generations of this being to which this mutation occurred. This is very clear and simple. In addition to something else , you are asking with disapproval, of course, how if evolution proceeds in a manner of creative chaos and random evolution, how can a male and female of living beings result from it if it proceeds randomly? Isn't this what you cling to in order to weaken the theory of evolution and prove your god, the god of gaps, and place it forcibly and forcefully insert it into every void ? Or a loophole that you create to work and storm the gaps, and it is one of the biggest logical fallacies committed by those who do not believe, but rather one of the biggest foolishnesses, because the harmony that exists between the male and the female, which enabled them to be able to carry out the biological process of reproduction, and how this happens if it was random, but I would like to explain to you that the explanation of this matter is very simple, which is that if you observe some types of bacteria with simple observation, you will find that they follow a method that explains to you the explanation of this matter and how the evolution of male and female resulted. The matter is not a problem at all, and every day bacteria evolve, so they lose a new function or gain another, and this results in mating between a male and a female, and this matter can be observed easily or by communicating with specialists in this field, such as a doctor or a laboratory analysis specialist, and thus the new functions are inherited by new generations. As for the issue of the existence of the male and the female, this is simple and its explanation is very easy, as these evolved bacteria produce during the mutation what resembles the male organ, so they make a copy and give it to the pike, which was originally female, so it becomes a copy of this type and has the ability to extend the other and this turns into The female after the mutation and genetic evolution refused to be a male and there is another way that these bacteria invented to make the female remain a female and not turn into a male and the male remains a male as he is and does not turn into a female by this bacteria placing inside it and containing it so that if it meets a female bacteria it takes some characteristics from it but does not turn into a male and the same thing happens with the male to make a copy of the DNA parts. It transfers a part and not all so the male remains a male as he is and the female remains a female as she is and this is a simple explanation for the fact that there is random evolution but it is able to create a male and a female and I know of course that my English is heavy for you and incomprehensible because you are not accustomed to scientific terms and complex scientific explanations so it is difficult for someone who is accustomed to patching religion and faith to understand or comprehend scientific terms and I add to my words that there are many ways to explain the process of evolution in bacteria and transfer genes through the virion that injects the bacteria and operates these cells for its account to make other copies of them From himself. And before the glorious ones speak what is on your mind . And in the mind of every believer, if we assume that the believer has a mind or awareness from the beginning, know that you will immediately rush to make and storm the hallucinations that you worship by saying that I did not clarify who created these bacteria that I have talked about at length and who indicates their work, and of course in your view he is a god. The gaps that you hasten to insert into every gap. Or an answer to those who answer it, we non-believers like you, you will say that the Antar god is the one who did it and created the bacteria and their work, but I will answer you with the integrity of the known credibility of science and tell you that science has not yet discovered where the bacteria came from, and I will not respond until science investigates and searches, but to think that the god is the one who did it is not possible, and it is the impossibility itself because simply if the god is the one who created the bacteria or viruses, then you are required immediately to answer these questions, the first of which is if the god you worship, who describes himself as merciful, compassionate, just and all-powerful, then why did he create this god, who possesses all these qualities, why did he create harmful bacteria? Harmful to children and kill them and viruses are also harmful and have harmed human bacteria for many generations for hundreds of years. Humanity has paid a heavy price for its severe damage. Is he helpless or incapable of doing anything other than harm? Why, even after your patching that I know very well, which is that he has wisdom in the harm resulting from harmful bacteria and harmful viruses? If you think that it is wisdom and not a deficiency or lack of resourcefulness or inability in the ability that claims to trust the faithful in a critic who is completely evasive, he is evil but capable or not incapable of doing anything other than sight. Then he is an evil, stupid, foolish man who runs the world stupidly and evilly. He is nothing more than a physical monster who loves himself and glorifies himself to the point of madness and foolishness. He is nothing more than a psychologically ill person. It would have been better for you, instead of worshipping him, to take him to a doctor. He preceded him from his past and his chronic inferiority complexes and his narcissism. He deserves to be treated, not worshipped. It is better for you to treat him instead of worshipping him. He is sick with self-love and narcissism. He does not deserve any respect or Any appreciation for his stupid, sick, despicable self, and I think that abandoning him and removing him from any person's life is enough to make it much more refined and beautiful . Finally, he explained that the first cell of the living organism is on its way to science discovering the beginning of its emergence or where it came from. It does not mean that science has not yet discovered the origin and manner of the cell's existence. This does not mean in any way that the god of gaps is the one who did it.
Here, after Aref finished his turn in the conversation and Ibn Mara Al-Helou took over the dialogue once again, anger was consuming him until his words overflowed and he was dripping from both of his lips like the bitter venom dripping from the mouth of a snake whose fangs protruded to inject the venom into the body of its victim. He began to rage and roam like a wounded or wounded horse, squabbling on the battlefield, while he was talking about the precision of the intelligent design of God and that this precise and complex design of the universe and living beings, from humans inside their bodies and in intentions and animals, cannot come about through a theory of evolution that runs in a random system, as Aref explained in his talk, and that God is the one who controls the movement of bacteria and who made them produce males and females and who made the living being and his body with this precise complexity, and that the human body and animal as well, especially humans, with its complexity and design confirms the opposite of what Aref proves of randomness or creative chaos, and that it is impossible for this intelligent and complex design of the human body to happen except by a great Creator. Ibn Mara Al-Helou confirms and praises the precision of the complex design of the human body as the greatest blessing bestowed upon him by the Creator, the Almighty God, the Most High and His benefactors. As a believing servant, he should thank his God, the best of creators, because the details of the body of every believer suggest and confirm that it is a design, and the design must have a designer and a great, innovative, creative, and revered creator, and not just a cumulative development that passed over time, as Aref tried to explain, no and a thousand no. Rather, it is a deliberate and planned design from a wise, knowledgeable, and great creator. Ibn Murrah al-Helou began to talk about the creativity of the Creator in intelligent design, its precision, magnificence, and creativity, and that behind it must be a great creator who deserves thanks, prostration, and worship as the least that should be and the least that the believing servant can offer to his Creator who granted him the blessing of life and bestowed it upon him, and how life with all its misery and wretchedness, and that man does not have a complete will, and freedom is a will with all its details , but it did not have a tool in coming to it from the beginning . But despite all this suffering, life in the view of Ibn Murrah al-Helou is a great blessing and a great gift that the Almighty Creator granted to humans and honored them above all other creatures, and it is their duty to dress this intelligent design and the great tone of life. To thank Him, glorify Him, sanctify Him, and return to Him. Time passed with Ibn Marra Al-Helou praising with poems the best of creators and the precision of the complexity and genius of the intelligent design of the living being and the human being whom God honored and distinguished from other creatures by making him a speaker who speaks, talks, produces, works, makes, and manages the universe with the work and accomplishments he achieves, distinguishing him from all other creatures. And an honor that deserves to remain submissive and humble to his Creator throughout his life. No matter what he does, this great deed that surpasses all deeds will not be returned to him. So we find him saying to the knower, if he performs for everyone or a person of prestigious status provides you with a great service in an important matter, you will remain throughout your life a captive to his favor, singing of his good deeds to you. So what about the God who provided you with the most important and greatest thing, that He is the best of creators who created you, made you equal, and composed your image with this intelligent, precise, and wonderful design in how your attitude towards Him should be, does he not deserve for you to worship Him?