On the planet Nevera, power does not belong to governments.

It belongs to one family.

The Piao family has shaped the world for generations, guarding the World Tree, a living archive of knowledge so vast it has guided the rise of modern civilization itself.

But control comes at a cost.

As global pressure mounts to access the Tree, old alliances fracture, hidden agendas surface, and a carefully maintained balance begins to collapse.

For the first time in history, the Piao family is no longer untouchable.

At the center of it all stands Angela Piao.

Brilliant, reclusive, and deliberately removed from power, she was never meant to stand at the heart of a political war.

But as the world around her begins to turn, allies shifting, trust eroding, and the very people her family once protected becoming threats, everything she once held stable starts to break apart.

The decision falls to her.

Not because she wants it.
Because no one else can.

Beyond the family’s influence, figures like Kael Everwyn move in the shadows, carrying motives that threaten to expose truths the world was never meant to see.

And as the line between truth and manipulation begins to blur, one reality becomes clear:

This was never just a debate.

It was a staged battlefield.

To understand what must be protected…
Angela will be forced to look into the past.

Because the truth behind the World Tree was never meant to be found.


Author’s Note: A female-led sci-fi story with politics, family dynamics, and AI — no romance, no harem, just story.

Current Update Schedule: 1 chapters per day

Join the Discord in my profile for updates, early info, and community discussions

@2026 [GenieLove]. All Rights Reserved.

yeah this feels way more real than the others


wait… so it's "voluntary" but like… not really??


Not force, but pressure through incentives and structure.


Correct. Distinction between formal freedom and practical freedom.


those sound the same but I know they're not 😭


"If you don't do it, do you lose opportunities?"


They can become coercive if alternatives are structurally weaker.


I feel like this one hits harder because it's about choice


I feel like they're about to destroy him with data


That's actually a strong indicator of non-compulsory behavior.


If it were coercive, you'd expect near-total participation.


Unless the system only needs partial participation to function.


Also she said people can stop anytime with no penalty.


that's like… everyone is doing something


Yeah but is that because they want to… or because not doing anything sucks??


she just pulled out Marcus like "look at this success story" 😭


imagine being used as an example mid-debate


Her argument is data-driven but selective.


Participation rates don't fully capture social pressure.


Correct. Absence of measurable penalty does not eliminate intangible influence.


Chapter 82 - The Lifetime of Piao: Chapter 80 — Freedom, Pressure, and Choice